Tag Archives: Methodist

Breaking News: Leaked MHA Memo Reveals Hospital Execs to Ignore Public Promise, Instead Undermine Nurses

6 Dec

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Media Contact: John Nemo, MNA, 651-414-2863 or e-mail

ST. PAUL (December 6, 2010) – An internal Minnesota Hospital Association (MHA) memo recently obtained by the Minnesota Nurses Association (MNA) reveals that Minnesota hospital executives have no intention of honoring their very public pledge to work hand-in-hand with nurses to solve the unsafe staffing crisis that garnered international media attention during 2010 contract negotiations.

Instead, the explosive memo reveals that hospital executives from across the state will invest an extraordinary amount of time, money and manpower in a three-year public relations and lobbying campaign aimed at defeating any attempt by Minnesota’s nurses to improve unsafe staffing conditions.

“We are deeply disturbed by the details contained in this memo,” said Minnesota Nurses Association President Linda Hamilton, RN. “At the conclusion of 2010 contract negotiations in the Twin Cities, these hospitals literally told anyone within earshot that they were committed to working with – not against – nurses when it came to addressing unsafe staffing. Instead, we’ve learned that they are likely going to spend hundreds of thousands – if not millions – of dollars, countless hours of staff time and other resources to fight against the very nurses they’re supposed to be working with.”

The memo, sent by MHA President Lawrence Massa to MHA senior leadership and hospital executives, includes the following details:

  • The MHA has already retained the Public Relations firm Himle Horner Inc., which masterminded the Twin Cities Hospitals’ anti-nurse, anti-union PR campaign during 2010 negotiations. Himle Horner will implement a “coordinated, long-term, sustained media and public relations campaign focused on what hospitals are doing to ensure quality, safe patient care in Minnesota and why [nurse-to-patient] ratios are not effective or needed,” according to the memo.
  • The hospitals will also use Himle Horner, whose founder, Tom Horner, had an unsuccessful gubernatorial bid in 2010, for a “sustained effort” of “communications and strategic activities” in response to any legislative or public relations efforts by Minnesota nurses in regards to improving unsafe staffing.
  • More than 30 hospital executives from across the state – including CEOs, Presidents, HR officials, Government Relations experts and PR and Communications directors – will make up a “steering committee” designed to “guide MHA’s advocacy efforts.”

“The hospitals want to spend the next three years flying directly in the face of what they promised to their patients, nurses and the public earlier this year,” Hamilton said. “How is any of this in the best interest of the patients and the communities these hospitals are supposed to serve? How is this good financial stewardship and leadership from these nonprofit executives? The public should be outraged, and I think they will be, once theyread the details of this memo.”

More than 12,000 Twin Cities nurses conducted a one-day strike for patient safety on June 10, 2010. It is the largest nursing strike in U.S. history. Twin Cities Hospitals and nurses eventually reached a contract settlement in early July, more than four months after negotiations had begun.

Founded in 1905, the Minnesota Nurses Association represents more than 20,000 nurses across the state. It is also an affiliate member of National Nurses United (NNU), the nation’s largest nursing union, which has more than 160,000 members across the country.

Important Links:

Twin Cities Hospitals & The Great Recession: Fiscal Restraint Goes AWOL

6 Jul

Just came across an interesting read from MedCity News on the financial missteps several Twin Cities Hospitals took during the recession of 2008-09 – specifically in terms of trying to expand too fast, borrowing big money and gambling (and losing) in the stock market. Not exactly the picture of financial restraint and prudence one might expect from non-profit entities charged with ensuring their customers’ health and well-being comes first and foremost. What do you think? (Click here to read the story.)

Methodist All-RN Meetings June 2

26 May

Park Nicollet Methodist Update (May 13)

14 May

We started negotiations this week like we did every other week – ready to talk about staffing.  And, like every other week, management refused to negotiate about our most important issue.  We expressed concern that management had a goal for falls in 2009 of 218 (there were actually 249 falls that year).  We know that it is nearly impossible to prevent every fall.  But, as the spouse of one of our team members, who has been a safety manager for 36 years said, “the ultimate goal should be zero, especially for never events.  If there are more than zero falls, you should be working diligently to work out why and to make it zero.”

Our staffing ratios are important because we will be able to provide better care and help prevent adverse events like falls.  Management’s response to our concerns?  “Falls have nothing to do with staffing levels.”  When we said that our current contract language about staffing was not sufficient, management said “we couldn’t disagree with you more.” We gave management a modified staffing proposal that really goes to our core issues and is easier for management to understand.  We answered all of their questions on this new proposal.  Mary asked the nurse managers how they budget for staffing on their units.  She also asked them how they feel when they leave the hospital and know that their units are short-staffed.  Management’s response?  Staffing is just fine.

We also dropped our proposals on expedited arbitration, union leave, and promotions and transfer.  We also lowered our wage proposal.  Management came back with the same set of proposals that they gave us last week.  We cannot accept management’s proposals. They move our profession backwards and do nothing to address the concerns of staff nurses.  If we stand united, we can win a good contract that moves our profession and patient care forward.
REMINDER!  All RN meetings Monday May 17.  7:45 am, 1:30 pm, 3:45 pm, and 6pm.  In the Methodist Auditorium.

Park Nicollet Methodist Bargaining Update (May 6) Flyer

7 May

TV News Coverage of MNA Picket Sign Making

6 May

Methodist Bargaining Update (April 22)

22 Apr

Nurse – Jeanne Adomaitis, RN, Methodist

It was great to see all the nurses at bargaining today!  Unfortunately, management kept dozens of nurses waiting for 40 minutes.  For every other meeting they have been on time.

Karen Anderson, RN from Labor and Delivery, spoke eloquently about what it is like to be a nurse.

In addition to concerns about the current staffing process, we presented:

  1. A method to decrease the cost and increase the speed of grievances to go to arbitration.
  2. A plan to have an agreed-upon process for a fair and free choice to be unionized (ie Melrose).
  3. A proposal to guarantee that union work stays union work even if the location changes.  This will ensure that skilled nurses continue to provide safe patient care.

Management talked about:

  1. Slashing benefits by requiring nurses to work a minimum of .5.
  2. Allowing management to have complete control over health insurance benefits.
  3. Allowing management a way to control the maximum number of hours a nurse can work in a pay period.  We believe that nurses are professional and able to use appropriate judgment.
  4. Discontinuing the use of an external unbiased vendor to conduct exit interviews.  This only costs $25 per interview.

We want a contract that advances patient care and the nursing profession.  Shouldn’t management feel the same?

NOTE: On April 26, MNA Bargaining team members will be available to answer questions from 6am-8:30am  in Conference Room 2 (by the cafeteria) and from 1pm-4pm in the Inlet Room.

Methodist April 22 Bargaining Update (Flyer)

22 Apr

Park Nicollet Methodist Management & the Truth

8 Apr

Stat of the Day

6 Apr

During 2009 at Methodist, they made a profit of $377.00 PER MINUTE during a time when they were reducing nurse numbers and laying off nurses. They could have added 200 more RNs each and every day in 2009 and still not lost money!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,896 other followers